Why Nationalism is Challenging Global Cooperation Case Studies in International Relations

Comments · 15 Views

Economic sanctions are measures imposed by countries or international organizations to alter the behavior of a target nation by limiting its trade, financial assets, or resources. While these sanctions can directly affect the economy, their most significant impact is often on diplomatic re

Nationalism has become a powerful force again in recent decades, changing political environments, influencing the course of policy, and affecting the character and efficacy of international cooperation. Many people believe that the demands of international relations assignment writing help, globalisation, growing inequality, and growing cultural variety within countries are the reasons for the rise of nationalism.

This phenomenon has caused nations to reconsider their commitment to cooperative international structures and how they interact with one another. While nationalism may foster pride and togetherness inside nations, it can also pose serious challenges to international affordable assignment service since it frequently prioritises individual interests, national sovereignty, and cultural distinctiveness over group efforts and the benefit of the whole world.

1. Comprehending Nationalism and International Collaboration

Nationalism is the idea that one's country is the most important place to be and that each country should run its own affairs without outside intervention. This ideology places a strong emphasis on national identity, which is frequently derived from shared values, history, culture, and language. An "us versus them" mindset, exclusionary policies, and xenophobia are some of the more severe manifestations of nationalism.

On the other side, international cooperation depends on nations collaborating to handle shared problems including commerce, security, health crises, and climate change. It calls on nations to occasionally put the interests of the world before their own immediate national interests, which is made more difficult when nationalist feelings are strong. The intricacies of these conflicting objectives are seen in global affairs and the growing difficulties faced by organizations like the United Nations, World Trade Organization (WTO), and World Health Organization (WHO), which strive to balance national sovereignty with the necessity of collaborative efforts.

2. Nationalism's Ascent and How It Affects International Relations

Nationalist movements have risen in recent years, with leaders on all continents advocating for policies that put their nations' interests ahead of their obligations to other countries. Among the main causes of this increase are:

Globalisation and Economic Inequality: As globalisation picked up speed, certain nations and groups profited more than others, leading to inequalities that stoked unhappiness. As people attempt to "reclaim" local economy and defend homegrown businesses, this discontent frequently takes the form of nationalism.

Identity Politics: Identity-based politics, which prioritise cultural preservation and anti-immigration sentiment, have gained popularity in many nations. These feelings may be reflected in policies that support isolationism and oppose outside influence.

Perceived Ineffectiveness of International Organisations: Many countries leave or reduce their involvement in international organisations, such as the United Nations, because they believe that these organisations have not adequately protected their interests.

3. Case Studies Illustrating How Nationalism Affects International Collaboration

A. The "America First" policy and the US

The Trump administration's "America First" strategy is a prime illustration of how nationalism affects international collaboration. The United States prioritised American interests under this strategy, often at the expense of long-standing alliances and international accords. Important instances consist of:

The Pew Research Centre reports that American public opinion on global participation has changed over time, with over half of Americans saying they are worried about ceding authority to foreign organisations and agreements. Under this nationalist objective, the U.S. strategy has disrupted established partnerships and demonstrated how nationalistic policies can destabilize global cooperation on trade and environmental issues.

B. Concerns about Brexit and the Dissolution of the European Union

The economic cost of nationalist-driven policies is demonstrated by data from the Office for National Statistics, which shows that U.K. exports to the EU decreased by 14% in the first quarter after Brexit compared to the prior year.

In addition to straining the British economy, Brexit has raised concerns about potential EU disintegration as populist movements in nations like Hungary, Poland, and Italy cast doubt on their own membership in the union. The EU's unity is under danger due to the emergence of nationalism inside one of the most significant cooperative entities.

C. Regional Tensions and China's Assertive Nationalism

China prioritises sovereignty and control above cooperative solutions, as seen by its strong posture and military presence.

The massive infrastructure and investment initiative known as the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) increases China's influence worldwide, but it also frequently results in partner nations becoming indebted to China. Critics point to a type of economic nationalism with worldwide ramifications, claiming that the effort advances China's strategic objectives rather than promoting reciprocal economic progress.

According to a Lowy Institute analysis, China's foreign policy strategy has harmed ties with Japan, India, and a number of ASEAN nations, making regional cooperation more difficult. The focus on economic supremacy and territorial integrity demonstrates how China's nationalist policies undermine global cooperation.

D. Russia's International Isolation and Nationalist Agenda

Interference in Foreign Elections: Russia's strategy of nationalism, which aims to erode opponents and increase its power, is reflected in its meddling in international elections, especially those in the United States and Europe. International cooperation on cybersecurity and diplomatic agreements are hampered by such acts, which also strain diplomatic ties.

According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, Russia has raised its military spending by around 26% in the past ten years, highlighting its dedication to both domestic defence and growth above international collaboration.

4. The Data Supporting the Conflict Between Nationalism and Cooperation on Climate 

Change Commitments: Because nations frequently put economic growth before of environmental commitments, 2022 research by the United Nations Environment Programme found that nationalist policies helped just 13% of countries reach their Paris Agreement objectives.

Economic Isolation: According to World Bank research, nations involved in trade disputes fuelled by nationalism, like the United States and China, have witnessed a 15% decline in trade, which has a negative effect on global economic growth.

Conclusion 

In summary, the emergence of nationalism poses a serious obstacle as well as an important opportunity for global collaboration and international relations education. While nationalism serves the function of uniting individuals around common identity, beliefs, and interests, it can quickly veer into exclusionary tactics that hinder collaboration on vital global concerns like climate change, trade, migration, and security. 

The case studies of China, Russia, the United States, and Brexit show how nationalistic policies have occasionally resulted in strained partnerships, isolation, and slowed progress on cross-border challenges. However, good policy frameworks may preserve national sovereignty while encouraging cooperative efforts, proving that nationalism and international collaboration are not mutually contradictory.

 

Comments